9 - Sorcery Is Science


We are taught that Eratosthenes of Cyrene measured the diameter of the earth, assuming that at noon the rays of the sun are parallel. However those teachers don't tell us how long should be the shadow of a given stick (pole2) over a sphere:

Having this knowledge, one can judge if the shadow reported by Erathostenes coincided with the expected round shadow or with the flat one. Buy the asumptions of Erathostenes one sees that he was against nature:

1. He assumed that the rays of the sun are parallel to the earth surface, which is opposite to what we see in our daily experience

2. He assumed that the distance Sienna-Alexandria was 1/50 of the earth, which means that he already knew the size of the earth!

3. He assumed that the earth was round, as if he was an allien that didn't know the flat surface nature of liquid water.


Watching the sea, the ocean and the land from above was not so hard

Socrates said to Simmias: It is said, in first place, camarade, kept Socrates going, that if somebody sees that earth from a high place, it seems as one of our balloons of wind covered with twelve bands of different colors..

http://www.michigantraveler.com/balloons.html Balloons were also thought to be used in ancient China for the coronation of emperor Fo-Kien in 1306. But most interesting are the recent discoveries in Peru which indicate that the first manned flight may have occurred nearly 2,000 years ago when the ancient inhabitants of that region built hot air balloons using latex rich sap from native trees to seal their envelopes.

http://www.island.net/~kitebike/history.html 200 B.C. A Chinese Taoist monk described a hot air balloon. At about the same time Huai-Non, a Taoist prince described in a book how to make an egg fly through the air. Empty out an egg through a small hole in one end. Put a wick soaked in oil into it, light the wick and see the egg fly. This is the first 'rocket'.

http://www.beijingscene.com/V05I009/ayi/ayi.htm Although Marco Polo purportedly saw kites in China, they were not made or flown in Europe until the 18th century. Traditional lore says that the kite was invented by the ancient master craftsman Lu Ban in the 4th century BC. So great was the old inventor’s kite-making skill that he was able to make a man-carrying kite - the world’s first hang glider: The classical text Records of the Court and People (guanchang xianxing ji) tells the story of Lu Ban leaving his home near the southern city of Suzhou to go to Liangzhou Prefecture to build a pagoda. Lu Ban used the left-over materials from the pagoda to make a ‘wooden eagle’ to fly home to his wife. This story may be as apocryphal as a VCD vendor’s promises, but numerous references to kites in the literature of the Spring and Autumn Period (770-476 BC) indicate that our ancestors were already using kites fashioned from bamboo and wood at that early date.


How in the world, knowing only a very small spot on the earth can someone to know how big is the earth? We see that is the same guessing technique of Cavendish, Newton, Galileo, and the others, camouflaged in the mathematical smog.


Many people around the world worship the e=mc2 formula and worship Einstein for that formula which says that the energy produced by an amount of gold is the same energy produced by the same amount of lead: Al last, the lead become gold, the old dream of the Alchemists!. With 1 gram of sand one can produce the energy that produce 1 gram of Uranium!. Isn't that marvellous?

In his letter to President Roosevelt - August 1939, Einstein clearly shows that the above formula is just a fraud, he didn't encouraged Roosevelt to use water, sand, garbage or paper, but just the very specific element URANIUM:


Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been communicated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uranium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the immediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part of the Administration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring to your attention the following facts and recommendations:

In the course of the last four months it has been made probable through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a large mass of uranium, by which vast amounts of power and large quantities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.

This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air.

The United States has only very poor ores of uranium in moderate quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia. while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo.

In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial capacity. His task might comprise the following:

a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action, giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uranium ore for the United States;

b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being carried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories which have the necessary equipment.

I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should have taken such early action might perhaps be understood on the ground that the son of the German Under-Secretary of State, von Weizsäcker, is attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the American work on uranium is now being repeated.

Yours very truly,


The following was the inteferometer used by Michelson - Morley in the year 1887

A ray of light was emitted from the source and when it met the half silver mirror it divided in two rays that followed two perpendicular path, and after some turns they met again and recombined in fringes pattern in the telescope

We see here that between the mirrors there is not physical connections

However, Fitzgerald and Lorentz referred to a strange material body

Fitzgerald's mind crunching proposal was that objects were 'foreshortened' in the direction of their motion by the 'pressure' of the ether wind. As the velocity of an object increased, he hypothesised that the resultant increasing pressure imposed by the ether wind shortened it evermore, to the point where travelling at light speed, the object would be foreshortened to 'nothingness'.

Lorentz contraction, in physics, contraction or foreshortening of a moving body in the direction of its motion, proposed by H. A. Lorentz on theoretical grounds and based on an earlier suggestion by G. F. Fitzgerald; it is sometimes called the Fitzgerald, or Lorentz-Fitzgerald, contraction. The Lorentz contraction hypothesis was put forward in an attempt to explain the negative result of the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887 designed to demonstrate the earth's absolute motion through space (see ether; relativity). The hypothesis held that any material body is contracted in the direction of its motion by a factor , where v is the velocity of the body and c is the velocity of light.

Watch the factor hides a component in which the velocity of light c is added the velocity v, and the other component c is decreased by v, just what they are denying

Without any doubt, Lorentz and Fitzgerald were assuming that the screws -glue or joint- that subjected the mirrors to the table made the mirrors to go closer and then to return to their original posicion.

Many variations of the Michelson-Morley device have been built, as the one made by George Sagnac in 1913

There is not measuring of the velocity of any material body

So, Lorentz and Fitzgerald introduced a non existent material body that was not in the Michelson-Morley interferometer to keep researchers entertained with mathematical manipulations mixing reality with fantasies avoing them to follow the next logic step.


Albert A. Michelson died on May 9, 1931 in Pasadena, California, (U.S.). Albert Einstein, in the same year, publicly paid tribute to Michelson's extensive contributions to science:

"My honored Dr. Michelson, it was you who led the physicists into new paths, and through your marvelous experimental work paved the way for the development of the theory of relativity."

... Soon I came to the conclusion that our idea about the motion of the Earth... is incorrect, if we admit Michelson's null result as a fact...[48]


Before Michelson-Morley Null Results

After Michelson-Morley Null Results

Among several others possibilities, exist the followings:

1.-The earth moves in not medium at all (its name doesn't matter).

2.-The medium exists but can not be detected by phisical tools.

3.-The earth doesn't move at all

It is very interesting that many 'wisemen' don't like to include the last possibility, which is a short for:

The earth doesn't move because is set in a place where it can not move.

That was the most horrible coup given to the Catholic Church, to the Masons, and to all other power of darkeness that for years had worked to brainwash of the people making them believe that the earth move because was place into an empty space, therefore that results had to be silenced completely.


Albert A. Michelson died on May 9, 1931 in Pasadena, California, (U.S.). Albert Einstein, in the same year, publicly paid tribute to Michelson's extensive contributions to science:

"My honored Dr. Michelson, it was you who led the physicists into new paths, and through your marvelous experimental work paved the way for the development of the theory of relativity."


There is a very interesting article on this question published in the August 1982 issue of Physics Today by Prof. Yoshimasa A. Ono. The article begins:

It is known that when Albert Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1922, he was unable to attend the ceremonies in Stockholm in December of that year because of an earlier commitment to visit Japan at the same time. In Japan, Einstein gave a speech entitled "How I Created the Theory of Relativity" at Kyoto University on 14 December 1922. This was an impromptu speech to students and faculty members, made in response to a request by K. Nishida, professor of philosophy at Kyoto University. Einstein himself made no written notes. The talk was delivered in German and a running translation was given to the audience on the spot by J. Isiwara, who had studied under Arnold Sommerfeld and Einstein from 1912 to 1914 and was a professor of physics at Tohoku University. Isiwara kept careful notes of the lecture, and published his detailed notes (in Japanese) in the monthly Japanese periodical Kaizo in 1923; Ishiwara's notes are the only existing notes of Einstein's talk...

Ono ends his introduction to his translation with the statement:

It is clear that this account of Einstein's throws some light on the current controversy as to whether or not he was aware of the Michelson-Morley experiment when he proposed the special theory of relativity in 1905; the account also offers insight into many other aspects of Einstein's work on relativity.

With regard to the ether, Einstein states:

Light propagates through the sea of ether, in which the Earth is moving. In other words, the ether is moving with respect to the Earth...

With regard to the experiment he argues:

Soon I came to the conclusion that our idea about the motion of the Earth with respect to the ether is incorrect, if we admit Michelson's null result as a fact. This was the first path which led me to the special theory of relativity. Since then I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment, though the Earth is revolving around the Sun. [48]

The above information gives us insight into the nature of Einstein's relativity theory. He believes that the sea of ether exists, but he also believes that it cannot be detected by experiments, in other words, he believes it is invisible. The situation in modern physics is very much like the Hans Christian Andersen tale of "The Emperor's New Clothes", with Einstein playing the part of the Emperor. The tale goes that the Emperor, who was obsessed with fine clothing to the point that he cared about nothing else, let two swindlers sell him a suit of cloth that would be invisible to anyone who was "unfit for his office or unforgivably stupid." It turned out that no one could see the suit not the emperor, not his courtiers, not the citizens of the town who lined the street to see him show off his new finery. Yet no one dared admit it until a little child cried out, "But he doesn't have anything on!"

In regard to Einstein's reluctance to acknowledge the influence of the Michelson-Morley experiment on his thinking, and Whittaker's argument that his special relativity theory was a clever restatement of the work of Poincaré and Lorentz, I report the following published [56] statements which Einstein made to Prof. R. S. Shankland on this matter:

The several statements which Einstein made to me in Princeton concerning the Michelson-Morley experiment are not entirely consistent, as mentioned above and in my earlier publication. His statements and attitudes towards the Michelson-Morley experiment underwent a progressive change during the course of our several conversations. I wrote down within a few minutes after each meeting exactly what I recalled that he had said. On 4 February 1950 he said,"...that he had become aware of it through the writings of H. A. Lorentz, but only after 1905 had it come to his attention." But at a later meeting on 24 October, 1952 he said, "I am not sure when I first heard of the Michelson experiment. I was not conscious that it had influenced me directly during the seven years that relativity had been my life. I guess I just took it for granted that it was true." However, in the years 1905-1909 (he told me) he thought a great deal about Michelson's result in his discussions with Lorentz and others, and then he realized (so he told me) that he "had been conscious of Michelson's result before 1905 partly through his reading of the papers of Lorentz and more because he had simply assumed this result of Michelson to be true."...


We see that Einstein was clear "the result of Michelson is true" and "..our idea about the motion of the Earth ... is incorrect...". The unexpected result of Michelson Morley was clean, neat, irrefutable, there was not a contra experiment to deny it: this result of light destroys thousands of years of the manufactured lie of a moving earth, in which thousands of Secret Societies, Governments, and all the powers of the darkness had worked.

The most incredible is that they didn't wait this devastating result from a mason as was Michelson. Most of the powers were powerless before this fact. They had to move fast to silent this result, then a year later - 1888- the very high princes dwelling within Madame Blavatsky gave the order that aether must be abolished (aether had been a lie cried long years before in order to hang the earth, but now become in a tremendous problem):


The septenary gradation, and the innumerable subdivisions and differences, made by the ancients between the powers of Ether collectively, from its outward fringe of effects, with which our Science is so familiar, up to the "Imponderable Substance," once admitted as the "Ether of Space," now about to be rejected, has been ever a vexing riddle for every branch of knowledge. (S.D., I, 331).

For that reason the Slave Einstein In The Evolution of Physics (1938), page 36 exclaimed the command of his lords:

'this is the moment to forget the ether completely and to try never to mention its name'

Most of us don't realize the languages and orders processed among the members of the Satanic Societies. The powerful demons within Blavatsky dictated in their language the formula e=mc2:


Our learned men will get out of this through some scientific technicality; but what is it that is intercepted, so as to imprison a certain quantity of it on glass, paper, or wood? Is it "Motion" or is it "Force"? Or shall we be told that what remains behind is the effect only of the force or Motion? Then what is this Force? Force or energy is a quality; but every quality must belong to a something, or a somebody(The Secret Doctrine Volume 1, pag 508)


but that we must seek for the ultimate causes of light, heat, etc., etc., in MATTER existing in super-sensuous states -- states, however, as fully objective to the spiritual eye of man, as a horse or a tree is to the ordinary mortal. Light and heat are the ghost or shadow of matter in motion.(The Secret Doctrine, Vol1,pag 515)

This was during the supreme and autocratic reign of matter. When the latter was dethroned, and MOTION was proclaimed the sole sovereign ruler of the Universe, heat became "a mode of motion." (pag 516)

Conceptions of Force are resumed by our conceptions of this, that, or another mode of motion." Force is thus simply the passage of one state of motion into another state of the same: of electricity, into heat and light, of heat into sound or some mechanical function, and so on.*

DARKNESS is the one true actuality, the basis and the root of light, without which the latter could never manifest itself, nor even exist. Light is matter, and DARKNESS pure Spirit. Darkness, in its radical, metaphysical basis, is subjective and absolute light; while the latter in all its seeming effulgence and glory, is merely a mass of shadows, as it can never be eternal, and is simply an illusion, or Maya. (The Secret Doctrine, Volume1, pag 70)

This may be said of elasticity in general; no elasticity is possible without change with respect to the position of the compound particles of an elastic body. This means that the elastic body is changeful and consists of particles, or, in other words, that elasticity can pertain only to those bodies that are divisible. And the atom is elastic."

This is sufficient to show how absurd are the simultaneous admissions of the non-divisibility and elasticity of the atom. The atom is elastic, ergo, the atom is divisible, and must consist of particles, or of sub-atoms. And these sub-atoms? They are either non-elastic, and in such case they represent no dynamic importance, or, they are elastic also; and in that case, they, too, are subject to divisibility. And thus ad infinitum. But infinite divisibility of atoms resolves matter into simple centres of force. (The Secret Doctrine, Volume 1, page 519)


In 1889 a short paper was published by the Irish physicist George FitzGerald in Science. The paper The ether and the earth's atmosphere takes up less than half a page and is non-technical. FitzGerald pointed out that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained only if

... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light.

Lorentz was unaware of FitzGerald's paper and in 1892 he proposed an almost identical contraction in a paper which now took the Michelson-Morley experiment very seriously. When it was pointed out to Lorentz in 1894 that FitzGerald had published a similar theory he wrote to FitzGerald who replied that he had sent an article to Science but I do not know if they ever published it . He was glad to know that Lorentz agreed with him for I have been rather laughed at for my view over here . Lorentz took every opportunity after this to acknowledge that FitzGerald had proposed the idea first. Only FitzGerald, who didn't know if his paper had been published, believed that Lorentz had published first!

Also called space contraction, is the shortening of an object along the direction of its motion relative to an observer. Dimensions in other directions are not contracted. The concept of the contraction was proposed by the Irish physicist George FitzGerald in 1889, and it was thereafter independently developed by Hendrik Lorentz of The Netherlands. The Michelson-Morley experiment in the 1880s had challenged the postulates of classical physics by proving that the speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. FitzGerald and Lorentz attempted to preserve the classical concepts by demonstrating the manner in which space contraction of the measuring apparatus would reduce the apparent constancy of the speed of light to the status of an experimental artefact.

The truth is that all the LEARNED men of Satan were working coordinately, in 1905 they had prepared the first part of the work to Albert Einstein and trained him how to speak how to answer, and all small movement. The non-jewish and the Jewish Secret Societies displayed a lot of publicity around Einstein and about Relativity, at the same a lot of distracting programs around the world. The second part was given in the second world war, as the greater distract factor. Every single step was planned and well runned, as some centuries before the same Secret Societies did with the Galileo-Catholic Church Show, they presented him as the logic man against a faithful Church; leading any attention of the people away from the real target. The Satanist Galileo was following all the time the instructions of the Catholic Church to fulfil its tactic plan.


2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

Tycho Brahe took the earth out of the water (2 Peter 3:5, Genesis 1:9,10) and put it into the center of heaven, and put everything around the earth. This iniquity was runned from before the Aristotle's days. To put the earth definitely in heaven was necesary an opposite doctrine: the sun in center of heaven. A lot of people forget that earth is not in heaven and engaged in any of the two lies

1.-The earth is at the center of heaven
2.-The earth moves though heaven

At the same time the Jewish Pharisees changed several passages of the Scriptures to give the idea that the earth is in heaven, as we can compare some passages of the Lxx with the Masoretic Scriptures:

After placing the earth within the space, then surrounded it with demons principalities:

Ancient wisdom named the planets not as physical globes but for the spirit which resided there. Thus, the moon (angels); Mercury (archangel); Venus (archai); sun (powers); Mars (mights); Jupiter (Dominions) and Saturn (Thrones). The preceding orders relate to the planetary logos emanating through the seven planets of the ancients and do not concern us here. (The inner circle of the Zohar.)

Above the planetary spheres reside the domains of the Seraphim and Cherubim. And in the creation of Saturn (Thrones) form the triad of the first round. Rudolf Steiner explains as such in The Spiritual Hierarchies

Just for curiosity’s sake I counted the entries in her bibliography - there are 169 References. There are 1166 Notes, most merely citing these references, but others offering in themselves little tidbits of interest. Many of you may have heard the story of Einstein’s having a copy of The Secret Doctrine on his desk (a fact confirmed by Cranston when she interviewed Eunice Layton, the woman who happened to be at the reception desk at the T.S. in Adyar, India when Einstein’s niece came to visit during the 60’s. As the niece explained, “she knew nothing of theosophy or the society, but had to see the place because her uncle always had a copy of Madame Blavatsky’s S.D. on his desk”). A perhaps lesser known story to be found in these notes is that of Robert Millikan, the physicist who won a Nobel Prize in 1923 for discovery of cosmic rays. He was also a reader of the S.D. During his tenure at Cal Tech, it was necessary to put one’s name on a long waiting list at the university library to check it out as the S.D. was so much in demand. As it was Millikan who helped to bring Einstein to the U.S. in the 30’s and to Cal Tech where he (E.) worked for three summers as a chef ( ! ), it may have been Millikan who interested Einstein in the S.D.

Albert Einstein and the Mysteries

The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. He who knows it not and can no longer wonder, no longer feel amazement, is as good as dead, a snuffed-out candle. It was the experience of mystery--even if mixed with fear--that engendered religion. A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which are only accessible to our reason in their most elementary forms--it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man. [The World as I See It]

The most beautiful and most profound religious emotion that we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. And this mysticality is the power of all true science. If there is any such concept as a God, it is a subtle spirit, not an image of a man that so many have fixed in their minds. In essence, my religion consists of a humble admiration for this illimitable superior spirit that reveals itself in the slight details that we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. [Interview with Peter Bucky]

It is very difficult to elucidate this [cosmic religious] feeling to anyone who is entirely without it, especially as there is no anthropomorphic conception of God corresponding to it. The individual feels the futility of human desires and aims and the sublimity and marvelous order which reveal themselves both in nature and in the world of thought. Individual existence impresses him as a sort of prison and he wants to experience the universe as a single significant whole.

The religious geniuses of all ages have been distinguished by this kind of religious feeling, which knows no dogma and no God conceived in man's image; so that there can be no church whose central teachings are based on it. [New York Times Magazine, November 9, 1930].

Enough for me the mystery of the eternity of life, and the inkling of the marvelous structure of reality, together with the single-hearted endeavour to comprehend a portion, be it never so tiny, of the reason that manifests itself in nature. [The World as I See It.]

Madame Blavatsky with Kuthumi, El Myora, and Saint Germain - all Ascended Masters - all the same soul which bio-located to be with her.

Ascended Masters refers to demons who have possessed many people - that is possesses flesh again which is reincarnation. Blavatsky as Einstein are burning and crying aloud in hell now in midst of worms that never die:

Mark 9:43 And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. And if thy foot offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter halt into life, than having two feet to be cast into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

The above sounded ridiculous to Albert Einstein, as it does to many:

The idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I am unable to take seriously. [Letter of 1946, Hoffman and Dukas]

What I cannot understand is how there could possibly be a God who would reward or punish his subjects or who could induce us to develop our will in our daily life. I cannot then believe in this concept of an anthropomorphic God who has the powers of interfering with these natural laws. [The Private Albert Einstein]

The man who is thoroughly convinced of the universal operation of the law of causation cannot for a moment entertain the idea of a being who interferes in the course of events - provided, of course, that he takes the hypothesis of causality really seriously. [New York Times Magazine November 9, 1930]

The more a man is imbued with the ordered regularity of all events the firmer becomes his conviction that there is no room left by the side of this ordered regularity for causes of a different nature. For him neither the rule of human nor the rule of divine will exists as an independent cause of natural events. [Science, Philosophy, and Religion, A Symposium]

Sadly Einstein discovered his error too late, as many do.